Hypothetical scenario, A person involved in a long term relationship decides for their own reasons to abandon.?

the relationship, That is'nt the issue. Both parties are mature adults that have a 27 year history they love each other and are caring enough to want for the other what they want for them selves. The scenario continues, the individual begins to craft plans that will ultimately lead them out of the relationship. The plans included, getting one of the individuals incarcerated for what the plan clearly indicated could be up to 2 years. The violations aren't disputed and the individual accepts responsibility for the discretion, the infractions are misdermener traffic related actually. None the less due to financial and vocational difficulties, that were disscused, became non- issue until the funds are avaiable. then the matter is resolved, there, a brief description is nesscarry in order to have a clear picture of the crime in question, its not like a battery, assault...etc.....continue's.well turns out that the length of incarceration was a bit presumtuous and the severity of the infraction was over estimated. Now one of the parties hears rumors of abuse that the first person is claiming to have recieved. There are no physical signs impossible other then maybe a couple of bruises due to an exceptional sex life and low iron. Now the plot thickens, the first party the one who wished to leave the relatiionship has the undivided and undisputable attention of others and thats really ok but and hears the question " how do you first, explain the details of incidents that are so diametrically oppisites, you would think that they weren't talking about the same day, place etc.. when they have heard them first from the proclaimed victims point of view.and thats fine unless the recollectiion of the occurances is not based in reality or the first party is trying to maximize the affect and get more attention or I dont kinow why "